Showing posts with label lois lane. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lois lane. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 29, 2022

Superman & Lois Season 2: Bizarro Bugaloo

 As far back as I can remember Superman has been my favorite superhero.  Which is why sometimes I can judge his adaptations more harshly than some others.  When Tyler Hoechlin was announced to play Superman in the second season of Supergirl I was unfamiliar with the actor.  After seeing his first few episodes I thought he did a fine job as the Man of Steel, but not great. Plus, he seemed a little short. Then the announcement came that he was getting his own show beside his Lois Lane co-star, Elizabeth Tulloch.  Again, I wasn't thrilled with these versions of the characters, but I was happy Superman was getting some attention after Henry Cavill's portrayal left Warner Bros treating the character almost like a pariah.  

The first season of Superman & Lois was a pleasant surprise to me.  We saw Clark and Lois moving back to Smallville, being parents with teenage boys, and one even developing his own powers.  It still had that CW/Arrowverse feel to it, but with a little more in my eyes like better effects.  Plus, the series seemed to distance itself from the rest of the Arrowverse with almost no references aside from a brief appearance by David Ramsey playing John Diggle. A cameo that didn't even need to be in the episode.  I think my enjoyment from this series really owes a lot to my age.  As a Superman fan I'm now at the point in my life where I am raising my own child and juggling a work-to-family life balance.  Much like how Smallville related to me being a teenager navigating my way through the world at the same time Tom Welling's Clark Kent was.  

As I said, the first season of this Superman series left me enthusiastic about a second season, especially with the additions of John Henry Irons and his daughter; Natalie. And much like how season one tried to trick us into thinking The Stranger was Lex Luthor, the creators also tried to trick us into thinking Doomsday was coming.  And fell for it hook, line, and sinker.  I didn't like the idea of bringing in such a definitive character so early in the series, and apparently neither did the showrunners.  It was revealed that the creature giving Clark headaches was a version of the character Bizarro, that set-up this season's overall story arc.

In season two a character known as Ally Allston is looking to merge with her alternate self from another world, and bring the two worlds together, thus merging every two people into one.  But we were never told what actual consequences this would have.  Would each one be as powerful as Ally? Would someone need the pendant to have that power?  I just never truly got the big ramifications of making the two worlds one, or why Ally even wanted to do it? After she had merged, she was all-powerful.  What else does she want?  Why merge the worlds?  The idea just doesn't sit right with me.

One the other side of this season is the Lane family dealing with Lucy, who was brought into Ally's cult and believed in her to the point of turning against her family at every turn.  I was honestly disappointed when Ally turned out to be the big powerful villain Superman has to defeat in this season.  Ally started off as someone who Lois was trying to deal with to get her sister back, but then became Superman's problem, leaving Lois kind of in the dust for the rest of this season.  

Season 2 saw our supporting characters struggle as well.  Jordan was dealing with whether to tell Sarah his secret or not.  Jonathan had to accept being the powerless brother, and the Cushing's struggled to get back together as a family after Kyle's deceit. Lana, Sarah, and Chrissy also all learned about Clark's secret identity. This is a story point that doesn't sit well with me. Arrow and The Flash started to lose its luster when so many people knew the main hero's alter ego, and their homebases became very crowded.  I'm glad Sarah knows about Jordan because after many seasons of Smallville I've see the teenage hero hide his secret from his would-be-girlfriend already, and that went on for too long as is.  But Lana and Chrissy knowing I think could hurt the series in the long run as it's only a matter of time before all the main characters know Clark is Superman, which is really just Kyle at this point.

However, the real short coming of this season was the release schedule.  I count almost five breaks in twenty-five weeks for the 15-episode season. This kept me having to try and remember what was happening in the series after weeks of not having a new episode.  I think it interrupted the flow of the season, and possibly lessened my interest in the story. I also could never remember when new episodes aired. 

But don't get me wrong. This season had some great moments like the submarine save, and Lois reminding Clark that Superman isn't just about saving people, he's about giving them hope.  I'm very interested in what's to come for season 3.  What's Tal up to in the other world?  Will Clark's major exposure to sun rays affect him long-term like in Grant Morrison's All-Star Superman?  Is John Henry and John Diggle about to team-up like an 80's action movie?  And how does Aquaman feel about Superman setting up his new clubhouse in the middle of the ocean? I don't expect that last question to be answered, but it'd be cool if it did.  This season I felt wasn't as strong as its predecessor but was still solid enough to get me to watch season 3.  I just hope that as The CW and Arrowverse seems to be falling, Superman & Lois continues to fly up, up, and away.



Thursday, March 24, 2016

5 Things I Want To See in 'Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice'

Yes, I know.  It's been a LOOOOOOOOONG time since I have written an actual blog on Blogger.  I hopped on the podcast bandwagon and have been riding that engine ever since.  But I felt like a topic such as this one deserved my special touch.  So, I guess that means that from time to time you still may see me write an actual blog.  But don't hold your breath on it.
I am only a few hours away from watching a film most fanboys have wait years, if not their whole lives, to see.  Anyone who knows me, or heard me talk about Man of Steel, knows I had some major issues with it.  Though none of them had to do with their pick of Henry Cavill as Superman.  It's Zach Snyder's style I thought ruined the film, and ever since I heard he was not only continuing with Batman v Superman, but Justice League as well, I've been afraid of the entire DC Cinematic Universe expansion.  I loved the casting of Ben Affleck and Jeremy Irons as Batman and Alfred.  I hated the casting of Jesse Eisenberg and Gal Gadot as Lex Luthor and Wonder Woman.  I want to like this movie.  I'm trying my best to walk into it with hope and an open mind.  But even today, as I see bad headlines online, I am preparing for the worst.
While not a fan of the previous film it was not without merit.  Like I said, I liked Henry Cavill as Clark Kent, I liked Amy Adams and Laurence Fishburne as Lois Lane and Perry White.  And I loved the visual effects.  Seeing Superman and Zod fight, while very unnecessary, was cool to watch.  So in order to correct this ship that Man of Steel has launched I've thought of 5 things I'd like to see in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice to get me on board with the DCCU moving forward.

1)  Superman must feel bad about killing Zod
I get that Superman kills every once and a while.  I've read enough comics to know he avoids it at all costs, but sometimes, it happens.  My main gripe with him snapping Zod's neck in MoS was tat it was the first Superman film of the reboot.  The audience didn't even get one film to establish his rule on not killing.  In Christopher Nolan's Dark Knight trilogy the first two entire films established that Batman went out of his way not to kill because it separates him from his enemies.  Is Snyder and writer David Goyer saying Superman has no quarrel with it?
I want Clark to draw the line in this film.  I want him to have thought about his actions and realized that Zod is the last life he'll ever take.  Jor-El sent Kal-El to Earth to "give the people of Earth an ideal to strive towards".  Right now, Clark is down in the mud with the rest of us.  That isn't Superman.  Like Captain America, he is supposed to show us that the right thing to do is usually the hardest choice.

2)  Keep Doomsday's screen time minimal
When I saw that Lex was going to turn Zod's corpse into the villain known as Doomsday I was horrified.  And not by Doomsday's appearance.  It was that they took this iconic, powerful, villain and put him in the 2nd film of this cinematic universe.  Marvel has been teasing Thanos for 6 films!  In the comics, Doomsday took out the entire Justice League before killing Superman.  Now, it appears that a rookie Superman and Wonder Woman, along with Batman, can handle this force of nature.  Um.....no.  
However, if Doomsday shows up at the end of this film, and the Trinity realizes they can't take down this beast alone, so then they form the Justice League to help them.  I'd be on board with that.  If you're going to waste a good villain like Zod in the first Superman film, and then double tap that bad decision by turning him into Doomsday, at least make it worth our while. 
    
3)  Show me Darkseid
We've all seen the parademons and the Omega symbol in the Batman v Superman trailer.  So we can all guess that Darkseid will be the big bad guy in the Justice League film.  In the mid-credit scene for The Avengers we got our first glimpse of Thanos and had non-comic readers saying, "Isn't that Red Skull?"  I want a tease like that.  I've seen parademons; show me the big guy.  Show me the ultimate galactic villain that Warner Bros and DC thought it would be ok to have in the 5th film of their cinematic universe(Marvel is at 13 and still not fought Thanos).  I just wanna know what he looks like.  I figure the Justice League film will loosely be based on Geoff Johns New 52 storyline; Origin.  Or if you want to check out the animated film, Justice League: War to get an idea what the live-action film may be like, it's also based in Origin. 

4)  Lois supporting Clark
In several storylines we see that Lois is Superman's anchor to humanity.  I will also give some credit to Ma and Pa Kent.  Clark is a being who is so powerful he can take over the world; possibly the galaxy.  But his human emotions, like love, are what keep him humble.  Without them, he'd really think he was a god.  Governments and vigilantes are coming after Clark for the destruction of Metropolis.  He will feel ashamed.  He will feel like his mission is not worth it.  Lois has to be there to support him.  To know that world needs someone like him to give them hope.  And Lois needs to be there for him so that he doesn't have to be "Superman" all the time.  I love that Lois knows who Clark is right from that start.  So let's not waste it.

5)  Don't screw up Wonder Woman!!!!!
Ben Affleck has proven himself in recent years to be not only an accomplished actor, but a great film maker as well.  I have no worries that he will make a good Batman.  But giving the most iconic female superhero character in history to a model who is trying to start an acting career?  What were they thinking!!!!!  
Granted, I have been trying to hold off judgement on Gal Gadot until I see the film, but I have been VERY scared of this casting choice since the beginning.  The only thing I've seen Gadot in is the Fast & Furious films and I was not impressed at all.  Rumor has it WW isn't in the film enough to make or break it, but with her own solo film coming out next year I feel like the entire female superhero film sub-genre is on Gal Gadot's shoulders.  And those shoulders look like they can barely lift a lasso.

Tuesday, August 25, 2015

Worth A Read? Superman: The Men of Tomorrow

It's no secret that I'm a pretty big Superman fan.  And anyone who know me knows one of my favorite writers is Geoff Johns.  Johns is the guy who resurrected Green Lantern, The Flash, and Aquaman into DC hits.  But as soon as Johns left those books I quickly lost interest.  He has a way of capturing the best in any character he writes.  A task that seems hard to replicate with some comic writers.  And while I haven't loved his current Justice League run it's been better than most books coming out of DC Comics these days.
Twenty-five years ago two scientists worked for the government on cracking inter dimensional travel.  Their work turned south and a black hole began to grow that would consume the world.  In an act of desperation, the couple sent their only child to one of the five dimensions they'd discovered.  There, the child grew up with powers beyond imagination and helped create a modern utopia.  But that couple that sent their child away to be saved?  Minutes later they stopped the black hole from consuming all of Earth.  And have been trying to find their son ever since.
Superman faces off against a new villain on the streets of Metropolis and gets a little help from a new hero; Ulysses.  Ulysses grew up in a another dimension and has the power to absorb energy to make himself fly and become much stronger than the average man.  He can even absorb Superman's heat vision.  Kal-El soon reunites Ulysses with his long lost parents and for a short time all seems good.  But Ulysses real motivation for coming back to Earth has yet to be revealed, and it involves six million lives.
I was excited for Johns to be back writing the Man of Steel.  Superman: Secret Origin is one of my favorites and his story(Superman: Last Son) with acclaimed film director Richard Donner added another level to the Superman myth by giving him and Lois a son.  Aside from James Robinson, very few writers I think capture Superman the way Johns does.  He knows the character is at his best when his hardest battle is within.  Ulysses comes from a utopia where hunger and disease no longer exist.  Clark has to to explain to this new visitor why they can't just use their abilities to make the people of Earth fall in line.  Ulysses must be reading Gods Among Us.
While this is not one of my favorite Johns stories it is still quite entertaining.  Johns added a new power to the Man of Steel's bag of tricks, but I didn't really see the point of it.  Clark now has the ability to admit a solar flare that decimates his enemies, but then Superman's powers are drained and Clark is human for several hours until his body recharges.  When Superman first appeared back in 1938 he couldn't fly and it was added later, but this new power just seems a bit over the top.  Do we really need to make Superman more powerful so the general audience will disconnect with him more?  I'm not a fan of it, but I guess as long as they don't use this new power that often I can learn to live with it.  
John Romita Jr pens this book beautifully.  I've enjoyed his art ever since he was drawing Spider-Man in the 1990's and then much later with Kick-Ass.  His style is very unique that I think it goes well with Johns's way of story telling.  I still prefer Johns to work with Gary Frank more, but Romita is good enough for me.
This book adds a few things to the Superman myth like giving him a new villain, a new power, and a person in Clark's life finds out his secret; and it isn't Lois Lane.  In fact, I was a little disappointed how little Lois had to do in this book.  Before the New 52, when Lois and Clark were married, their relationship was a center piece of Superman's humanity and life.  Now that Clark is hooking up with Wonder Woman Lois is really irrelevant; which makes me kind of sad.  
If you are a true fan of Superman tales or tales written by Geoff Johns I recommend this book for you.  But if you are borderline agreeable on either of those topics you can probably skip this one for now.

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

My 5 Dislikes/Likes About Man of Steel



Last night was Game 6 of the NBA Finals.  The San Antonio Spurs played the Miami Heat.  Who won; who cares!  Loyal Spurs fans of Austin stayed at home or gathered at sports bars and left me the opportunity to sit in a semi-empty movie theater and re-watch Man of Steel without the distractions a crowded theater would bring.  As I was walking into the theater a pizza delivery guy complimented me on my Kingdom Come t-shirt.  I told him it was my second time seeing the film and he replied, “you liked the movie?” as if I should have taken off my t-shirt right there and had fanboys throw vegetables at me.  I said, “Not really, I just want to make sure it’s not complete shit.”
I love Superman.  I remember going to the comic book store as a kid and picking up Superman #75, The Death of Superman.  I’ve followed him from The Fall of Metropolis to the Last Stand of New Krypton and I couldn’t wait for another Superman movie to be made.  I’m one of the select few who liked Superman Returns.  I get why people didn’t like it.  I mean what’s the point of having the most powerful man on Earth in a film if he’s not going to hit somebody, right?  I know why a general audience rejected it, but anyone who really gets what Superman is all about knows he’s about more than just throwing punches.
That being said, Man of Steel is the antithesis of Superman Returns.  This film was action packed!  Director Zach Snyder of 300 and Watchmen fame was picked to head this project.  David Goyer, the writer of all three Blade films and The Dark Knight trilogy co-wrote with Christopher Nolan producing.  From the beginning I felt like Zach Snyder’s style wouldn't  fit with the ray of light Superman is, and not one of Nolan’s films had any bright suits in them.  So my hope layed with David Goyer.  I have now realized that Goyer is great at writing anti-heroes.
Man of Steel is the not the Superman I grew up reading, or any of us grew-up watching on TV and film.  Snyder, Nolan, and Goyer wanted to take this character into the modern age and make him relatable, but in doing so they changed some very core values that make Superman the best hero there ever was.  I wanted to see this film twice before I wrote this entry because the first viewing left me confused and thinking about what they got wrong.  During the second viewing I was sitting in the theater thinking about what small changes they could have made to make it better, or what I would have done.  In my second viewing I learned to appreciate the good stuff a little more and came up with these lists.

DISLIKES
#5 Virtual Jor-El
In the Christopher Reeves films Marlon Brando played Jor-El and when the Fortress of Solitude rose from the Artic he had an interactive message for his son about who he was and where he came from.  A similar message came from this Jor-El, played by Russell Crowe. He told him where he came from, why he was sent to Earth, and what he was supposed to do.  Then Jor-El’s conscious came aboard Zod’s ship, and that’s where it got weird for me.  Jor-El pretty much got Lois out of danger by controlling Zod’s ship.  I know Krypton had advanced alien technology, but what is the point of Jor-El dying if he’s going to act "alive" the entire film and interacting with not only Clark, but every character! Zod then speaks and deletes Jor-El aboard the recently risen ship.  I personally hope that’s the last we see of Jor-El for the rest of this franchise. 

#4 Minor Character Development
The main characters in this film were Clark, Lois, Jor-El and Zod.  I get that.  But when they interact with people around them and then those people are in danger I want to care about them, which means I need to know them so I can care about them.  From his interactions with Lois I got a sense of who Perry White was, and I think Laurence Fishburne did a good job.  But who is Jenny and why do I care that she’s trapped in a pile of rubble?  And the guy trying to help get her out, Steve, only had like one line at this point before this heroic act.  He was a useless character.  Perry could have been there by himself trying to help Jenny and that would have saved some money on hiring that actor. Colonel Hardy served his purpose, Dr. Hamilton played a pivotal part, but I all I know is that he carries mints in his pockets.  I think Martha Kent’s part could have been amp’d up a bit, but I blame the flashback for that one.
 #3 Pacing/Flashbacks
This film had four flashback scenes.  They helped set-up Clark’s childhood and growing up different.  In one scene Clark’s powers make him scared, another shows him getting picked on, and another is Clark using his powers in public.  The final flashback is a tornado, but I’ll get to that in a minute.  Those three flashback scenes could have been combined into one and ended the movie sooner and get to the bathroom quicker.  Batman Begins starts the same way.  It started out with a troubled hero trying to find his purpose, sprinkled in the heroes troubled youth flashbacks, and then put him in the cape.  The problem with Man of Steel is that the flashbacks were still going on after we saw Clark in the cape.  When Bruce put on the cowl we knew everything that led him to this point because the flashbacks were done.  When Clark put on the suit I still didn’t know if his parents were dead or alive, or how he ended up in The Perfect Storm.
The spaceship crashes, cut to Clark getting picked-on by bullies on bus/kids whispering about him.  Bus then crashes and Clark saves them. Jonathan Kent then validates his sons decision to help people, tells him where he’s from, throws in some great Pa Kent wisdom, and we cut to Clark on the damn fishing boat.  No more flashbacks, minus Jonathan’s death, and we now know Clark’s past struggles and I care about him.  DONE!

#2 Jonathan Kent
In every interpretation of Superman Jonathan Kent has died from a heart attack.  Why a heart attack?  Because it’s a lesson for Clark that no matter how powerful he is he can’t save everyone from everything, even his own father.  In Man of Steel Jonathan Kent, played by Kevin Costner, gets killed in a tornado because he tells his son not to use his powers in public, even to save his own life.  Mr. Kent told Clark the entire film not to help people, one day, but not today. Not for another twenty years at least.  When Clark asks, “what was I supposed to do, just let them die?” and Jonathan replied, “Maybe.”  Oh hell no!  Jonathan Kent would never tell his son that!  This Pa Kent came off as very hard and almost cold.  Jonathan has always been loving and protective of his son, but knows Clark was meant to help people.  Mr. Kent, meet Uncle Ben.  “With great power comes great responsibility.” At least now I know how this Superman could snap someone’s neck; bad parenting.
 #1 Zod’s Death/Ending Fight Sequence
This ending is already making a buzz on the Internet and for good reason.  Superheroes, classic superheroes, never kill.  Superman is the model of that code.  He’s the best of them all, a beacon of hope.  He’s the light in a world of darkness.  In The Dark Knight, Batman, an anti-hero, does not kill the Joker and avoids it at all costs.  But Goyer and Snyder thought, eh, Superman now kills and Batman doesn’t.  But to be fair I think Zod never should have been there to begin with.
Superman flies into Zod’s ship and uses his heat vision to crash it.  Next we see Superman save Lois and then after all the other Kryptonians are gone he fights Zod to the death, while killing more people in their battle.  He does this by not only causing destruction, but when Zod throws a fuel truck at him Superman gets out of the way and the LexCorp truck brings down a building, probably killing hundreds of more people.  But when four people are threatened with heat vision, then he decided to go all “Punisher" on Zod. Superman cares about everyone, and does everything he can to avoid anyone getting hurt.
Now when I said Zod never should have been there what I meant was that after the ship crashed, while Lois and the gang where still arming the phantom bomb, Zod and Superman should have had their space battle then, making it shorter and ending with Zod going into the Phantom Zone with the rest of the Kryptonians and Superman saving Lois.  DONE!  You get you're Superman/Zod fight and the integrity of the character would still be intact.  Somebody give these people my number!

LIKES:
 #5 Special Effects
When I read Superman comic books and see the action in the pages I imagine how it would go down in real life.  Well, real life has finally caught up with my imagination.  I saw this film the first time in IMAX 3-D and was well worth it.  The fight scenes were awesome, if not a little over-the-top, and the flying sequences were phenomenal in 3-D.  I finally got to see what a real-life Superman can do.  I also got to see most of Metropolis destroyed, but I only blame a few blocks of that on Superman and his disregard for human life.

#4 The Suit
Nicholas Cage once said, “the Superman outfit it like a Coca-Cola bottle, you don’t mess with that.”  Tell that to Nolan and Snyder.  Superman’s suit has gotten darker for this darker version, but it’s not so much the tone but the texture I like.  He’s not wearing tights, but something close to Kryptonian battle clothes, no red underwear, and it looks cool.  Now, how Jor-El got this colorful suit on a ship that had been buried for thousands of years is a bit of a plot hole, but it does resemble what Zod and Jor-El wear, including the cape, but minus the colorfulness.  In most Superman interpretations Martha Kent makes his suit and if they could have found a way to incorporate that it would have been nice, but I’m ok with this too.

#3 Henry Cavill
I was pretty upset at first when I heard that Henry Cavill from Britain was picked to played the greatest American hero.  I saw Cavill in the few episodes of The Tudors and also in the Immortals.  Don’t both watching Immortals; your welcome.  Anyway, Cavill looked the part and acted the part.  His tone was strong but kind.  The interrogation scene and the final scene with General Swanwick I thought were a perfect performance of what Superman would have said and how he would have said it. I look forward to seeing what Cavill can do later in the franchise.
 #2 Krypton
For over 30 years the planet Krypton has been portrayed as an ice planet inhabited by crystal fortresses.  This Kryton is full of life and not a crystal in sight. Jor-El is pretty bad ass for a guy who was bred just to be a scientist, but he does what needs to be done instead of just being all talk. We get to see the politics of the world as well as a civil war.  We see a world that is about to explode because they have an unstable core by using up all their natural resources, which of course is a wink to all the hippies watching. We mainly see a world not unlike our own, but older, and could possibly be Earth one day. My only dislike is the use of the yellow sun instead of a red sun.  Kal gets powers on Earth not because it’s a different sun, but because it’s a newer sun; lame.
The science of adapting to Earth's atmosphere and gravitational pull also adds a sense of sci-fi believability in the film. Probably my favorite part of the Krypton plot is that normally Kal flies off just as the planet explodes. In Man of Steel he leaves the planet some time before it explodes.  These little twists help make it interesting to fanboys like myself and keeps things fresh. Well done.
  #1 Lois Lane
It took Lois Lane decades to find out that Clark Kent was Superman.  But when Amy Adams plays the character she finds out in like a few weeks.   Lois is a great investigative journalist so to not make the audience think she’s stupid she tracks down her hero after he saves her the first time and has it all figured out before he even makes his first public appearance.  At the end of the film Lois meets the newest member of The Daily Planet, Clark Kent.  Then there is this look between them that lets us know that nothing will be like we know it was.  Lois knows who Clark is and for the rest of the franchise she will know.  He will not have to hide it from her, and their total relationship is fresher than all the buildings being re-built around Metropolis.
If I had one complaint about the character it’s why she’s in it so much.  Why does Zod want Lois to go to his ship?  He just sends her to a holding cell.  Was he waiting to anal probe her?  And then Lois is on the plane with Colonel Hardy, but why?  Yes, she knows how to use the phantom bomb, but she's a civilian and how hard is it to stick the key in the hole?   She doesn’t even know how to do it right and Dr. Hamilton has to fix it.  Oh, and General Swanwick?  If they would have changed him to General Lane it would have served Swanwick’s purpose and also given you more character depth with Lois.  Seriously Warner Bros, I’m on Twitter, look me up!
 So, I feel that Man of Steel wasn’t even close to beating the magic of Superman:The Movie in my eyes, but in no way was as bad as Superman III.  With all the elements such as directing and casting I knew what this film could potentially be and therefore was not too surprised when it didn’t live up to what I wanted it to be.  But it seems to have lived-up to what Warner Bros wanted.  It’s already made a butt-load of money and a sequel may come out by next year.  DC has finally jump started what Marvel did back in 2008 with Iron Man.  A Justice League movie will be out before we know it.  Personally I’m still trying to decide it that’s a good thing or not.
I thought this film may be like Superman: Earth One and it’s pretty much what it is.  I didn’t like Superman: Earth One, but I did like Superman: Earth One: Vol. 2 if you get what I’m saying.  So maybe there is a bit of “hope” in this film after all.

Sunday, June 9, 2013

5 Life-Lessons from 5 Superman Movies

Well kids, the time has come.  Once again Hollywood is taking another shot at the Man of Tomorrow, the original superhero, and an American, if not worldly, icon.  Man of Steel premiers in theaters this week.  Christopher Nolan and David Goyer, the men behind The Dark Knight Trilogy, have teamed up with 300 and Watchmen director Zach Snyder to give us a modern take on Superman. Being a Superman fan I’ve been fearful of this film with every piece of news I heard about it, but that’s an opinion for another blog entry.
I’ve spent the last 5 Sundays re-watching the last 5 Superman films.  Just yesterday I was chatting to someone about upcoming movies and I mentioned Man of Steel.   She said she really didn’t like Superman and that she liked Batman more.  Well, anyone who knows me knows that this is a good trigger to set me off on a major rant!  Some people seem to think the Man of Steel is just a big blue Boy Scout who never does anything wrong and always plays by the rules.  To those nay sayers I simply reply, “You obviously don’t know Superman.”  I’m sure they’ve never watched an episode of Smallville or even read The Death and Return of Superman.  There is a reason the character has been around for 75 years and inspired the entire genre of superheroes.  There are a lot of life lessons to be learned from this character, and these cinematic adventures are just five of them.

Superman (1978): Director Richard Donner was the first to give a serious take on Superman’s origin and create an epic film for all others to live up too.  Christopher Reeve plays the double role of Clark Kent and Superman with superiority.  Gene Hackman isn’t the most ruthless of Lex Luthor’s and I’ve never been fond of Margot Kidder as Lois Lane, but the film itself and Reeve's performance is enough to carry the film to glory.   My only negative comment about this film would just be the ending.  Superman spins the world back-in-time to save Lois, but Jimmy still remembers Superman saving him?  In an otherwise flawless film that was a pretty big plot-hole Mr. Donner. Plus we all get to hear all John Williams classic score in this film for the first time, big plus!
Life-Lesson Take-Away from Superman: You have to find out who you are and you’re place in this world.  Plus you have to do whatever it takes to protect the people you care about, even if it does involves spinning the world back a few minutes.
Superman II (1980): By the time Superman premiered Superman II was already in production and almost finished filming, but a disagreement between Donner and the film’s producers got Donner fired before filming was done and he was replaced by Richard Lester.  Having seen the Richard Donner cut on DVD I think it was for the best, but looking at Lester’s Superman III it was probably a combination of both directors that made this film fly higher than the original.
 In this sequel Superman gives up all his powers and super status to be with Lois.  Of course this is the exact time that Krypton's three greatest criminals, led by General  Zod, come to Earth to take their revenge out on Kal-El.  Terence Stamp rules this film with is portrayal as General Zod and the reason Zod has become such an iconic Superman villain.  I’m sure Michael Shannon’s Zod performance in Man of Steel will be scarier for today’s audience, but he won’t win my fear until he says, “Kneel before Zod!” I am looking forward to a more updated fight scene between Superman and Zod.  More like Neo vs. Mr. Smith in The Matrix Revolutions.  “Mr. Kent, welcome back.  We’ve missed you.”
Life-Lesson Take-Away from Superman II:  Clark’s selfish desires almost caused the entire world to be placed under Zod’s rule, but eventually he realizes that Superman belongs to the world, not just Lois.  We all have responsibilities.  We have people who count on us to do our jobs and even if it would be better to just let go you might end up getting a lot of people hurt.  Also look out for bear-skinned rugs that are pink!
Superman III (1983):  It’s probably a toss-up between this film and the next Superman film as to which one is the worst ever.  I vote Superman III because it tries to take itself seriously, which is what makes it so bad.  Richard Pryor plays a computer genius who falls under the wing of an evil billionaire, who is not Lex Luthor.  Pryor’s character and his employer try to create kryptonite and end up with something that makes Superman go crazy instead.  Clark becomes a jackass version of himself and must find his sanity in order to take down the bad guys and their super computer located in the middle of frikkin nowhere!
Pryor’s character is so dumb there is not a scenario in this reality that would make me believe he’s a computer genius.  Pryor’s antics take center stage in this film and overshadow Reeve’s channeling the Man of Steel’s inner turmoil.  This dumbs down the film and makes it horrific to watch.  The only redeeming quality of this installment is Annette O’ Toole as Clark’s high school crush, Lana Lang.  Lana is a far better character than Lois, and easier on the eyes if you ask me. O'Toole went on to play the character of Martha Kent in the series Smallville.  She’s stated the reason she got the job is because when the creators found out she was in Superman III they insist she be in their version of Superman. 
Life-Lesson Take-Away from Superman III:  We all have our inner demons to fight.  We have to find a way to beat them down so we can do what we must do, and what is the right thing to do.  But if you ever find yourself fighting your alter ego in a junkyard you might as well just drop a car on yourself and be put out of your misery.
Superman IV: The Quest For Peace (1987):  The only reason I like this film better than Superman III is because of it’s even more ridiculous and can in no way be taken serious. That makes it such a good bad movie to watch.  Superman is on a mission to rid the world of all nuclear weapons.  But he didn’t count on Lex Luthor stealing a sample of his hair and attaching one of his genetic experiments to a bomb that Superman just happens to throw into the sun, thereby creating his own worst enemy, Nuclear Man. Duh, Duh, Duuuh!
The film is a little over 90 minutes and is so bad it’s hilarious to watch. Just last week as my wife and I were watching it and she had to point out the ludicrously of Clark going on a double date with Lois and Superman.  I mean that’s just crazy!  Reeve should have stopped at Superman II, or least not been given the opportunity to help write this one himself.
Life-Lesson Take-Away from Superman IV: The Quest for Peace:  The world has problems people, lots of them.  As much as we would like to change the world we can’t change to people in it.  All we can do is keep “it the same as it’s always been……On the brink. With good fighting evil. See you in twenty.” Oh and never trust a film where Jon Cryer is the comic relief.
Superman Returns (2006): Well, after those last lines by Christopher Reeve we do get the next Superman film, twenty years later!  Brandon Routh steps into the red boots while Kevin Spacey shaves his head to play his arch-enemy.  Superman has just flown in from his five-year journey to find the remains of his home planet.  But everyone else has gone on without him.  Lois Lane has a family and little secret to tell the Man of Steel.  Meanwhile, Lex Luthor is out of prison, rich as a hell, and is planning on using kryptonian technology to re-invest in his real-estate ventures while wiping out most of America.
A lot of people didn’t like this film, which is probably why it took seven years for another Superman movie to be released, but I’m a fan of it.  It doesn’t have a lot of action, but instead of taking a tale from the comics and fucking it up royally like most adaptations do (I’m looking at you Brett Ratner) director Bryan Singer took the essence of the Superman characters and made something different, with a little homage to the Christopher Reeve films.  He still made it feel like a pure Superman story.  Some argue that Kate Bosworth isn’t your classic Lois Lane, but she’s a mom now, parenthood changes us all!
Life-Lesson Take-Away from Superman Returns:  We grow up, we move on with our lives, and people we leave behind also move on.  We have to try to keep the people who are important to us in our lives or we may lose them.  And if your ever gone for five years and your ex has a kid who is four years old you’d better find the next ship back to Krypton!

A part of me thinks Man of Steel will be bad and another part hopes it will be good.  Either way it has gotten people talking about the character again and I hope it shows them that the battles Superman face are the ones we face ourselves.  I mean he’s called the Man of Tomorrow people, he ain’t goin anywhere! 

Monday, January 21, 2013

The Man of Steel's Pal Will Be.......A Girl?

This week's blog was already written in my head.  I was going to share my thoughts and feelings on the great gun debate that everyone seems to be engulfed in, but then I found something way more pressing to talk about; Jimmy Olsen is a girl!  In the upcoming film by director Zack Snyder, Man of Steel, it seems they are planning on replacing Superman's best friend, Jimmy Olsen, with a female counter part, Jenny Olsen, played by Rebecca Buller.
My brother alerted me to this grave crime, and I, being a bigger Superman fan than he, become enraged with fury.  Jimmy Olsen is a character that goes to the very core of the Superman mythology.  In the center of the story you have Clark Kent, Lois Lane, Lex Luthor, Perry White, and Jimmy Olsen.  These are just five characters you can just alter and not expect to get hell from the fan boy community. As of right now Lex Luthor is not listed on the IMDB website as a character in Man of Steel, and Laurence Fishburne will be playing Perry White.  Now changing Perry from an old white guy to an old black guy isn't too much of a difference, however, I will remind you his last name it WHITE.  I know that in this P.C. world where you can't step on a bug without pissing somebody off the way to help a movie make money is to diversify your film as much as possible, but it shouldn't be at the expense of the story.  Changing Jimmy from a young male to a young female completely changes the dynamic of the Superman mythology that the film will be based on.
Now odds are this Jenny could not be Jimmy changing his sexual identity, but perhaps his sister and Jimmy will be in the sequel, but let's stick to the point.  This female character who is replace a male character could ruin this movie!  If you know anything about the character of Jimmy Olsen you know that he is a young photographer for The Daily Planet who works with Clark and Lois, gets Perry's coffee, and is everything Superman fights for.  Jimmy is idealistic.  He likes to give people the benefit of the doubt and thinks people are mainly good.  He even starred in his own comic book at one point.  Now when Clark has a rough week of fighting super villains Jimmy reminds Clark that there are good people in the world besides him, and these people are who he continues to fights for.  Clark and Jimmy hang out, Jimmy has his own watch to call on Superman when he's in trouble, and I think at one point Clark lived with Jimmy as his roommate.  How is that relationship going to be the same when Jimmy is Jenny? 
To answer my own question  believe I have the answer; love triangle, or some form of puppy love.  You see kids, love triangles are all the film franchise rage lately from Twilight to The Hunger Games.  Clark developing a relationship with Lois would be just too simple for the film making hot shots of Hollywood.  My guess is that when Lois and Jenny go out to cover Superman's adventures like Lois and Jimmy did that they'll both be smitten by the Last Son of Krypton and two tongues will fall the floor.  
Of course this is all just hypothetical from what I know and what I hear about Man of Steel, and I had nothing to do with the making of this film, so don't quote me only any of this.  But this little idea of Jimmy's possible gender switch does not help the fear I've had about this movie from the beginning. David Goyer, the man who wrote all 3 Blade and Dark Knight films wrote the story and screenplay for Man of Steel, and I know Goyer as a big comic book fan so I trusted him.  Christopher Nolan, who is producing, is also a great film maker, who makes great films, as is Snyder.  But to put all three of these people on a Superman film seemed like a mistake to me being that most of these gentleman make darker and more gritty films.  Now that kind of tone is great for Batman, Blade, and Watchmen, but dark and gritty is the exact opposite of what Superman is.  And seriously guys, a British actor to play the ultimate American hero?
I'm told Man of Steel will make Superman more relatable to modern film audiences, but both DC and Marvel have ruined film versions of their characters by straying from the formula that has made their characters work for decades!  If Snyder ruins this chance for Superman's silver screen comeback he may just beat out Brett Ratner on my list of people I need to kick in the nuts. "What was I supposed to do? Just let 'em die?"  "Maybe"  
MAYBE, MAYBE!  Do you even know who Jonathan Kent is!  Come on guys!  Pull you're heads out of those studio executive's asses and make the film worthy to be called MAN OF STEEL!  Do it for comic book truth, film justice, and god damn it, The American Way!  Here's the trailer, judge for yourselves: